David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > "David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message | > | [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... | > | > [...] | > | > Anyone interested might want to read the actual proposal. See | > | > http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1406.pdf | > | | > | Yes, I found that on my own, and noticed that of the two "mutually | > | exclusive designs", the one with one feature was chosen over the | > | one with three features. | > | > In fact, these notions are not mutually exclusive. There was a debate | > to that effect on the committee reflectors, recently. | | Was it on "-core" or did I miss it somehow?
See c++std-ext-5658 and the whole thread that followed. In fact, you didn't miss it: You were the first person to reply... with the usual reaction ;-] -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
