"David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> [...]
>> Which is the best approach is very application dependent. I never
>> came to a firm conclusion as to which approach was better for
>> smart pointers; both have advantages.
>
> Well, we've managed to hobble along with "absolute orthogonality"
> so far, so we'll see how long that pans out. Seems to be holding up
> pretty well. It forces you to think very carefully about your design,
> that's for sure.
What about the extra size due to the common compiler feature, "no
empty base optimization in the presence of MI?" That was another
problem solved by using a chain of policy templates.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
