"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [...] > What about the extra size due to the common compiler feature, "no > empty base optimization in the presence of MI?" That was another > problem solved by using a chain of policy templates. > [...]
True, but so far, it's only been an unsolvable problem on one compiler. Of course, if anyone wants to try out the code on something other than bcc 5.5, gcc 3.0, or vc 6.5, I would definitely like to see if it *is* a problem on other compilers. And frankly, VC++ is beginning to annoy me greatly. There's a large number of small features that have to be worked around or outright sacrificed for it. I guess I'm curious to see if 7.1 has the same size problem, but I don't have access to that yet. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
