> > 1. Does not Boost.Thread already have locking mechanisms > > The only thing boost threads offer is #1 on my list, that is "The ability > to acquire a lock and release it when the object goes out of scope > effectively implemented the "Monitor" concept". Implementing this idea is > rather easy and obvious. It is the other things my classes offer that > make it interesting. The differences should be obvious.
In any case it should be part of Boost.Thread IMO. You may propose your classes as an extension to existent Boost.Thread functionality. > > 2. IMO any locking mechanisms should be implemented in terms of smart_ptr > > This makes absolutely no sense to me, could you please explain your self. Look on my other post on the topic Gennadiy. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
