Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ken Hagan wrote: | | [ ... &k ... ] | | > So presumably we are all now in complete agreement, except perhaps | | I, for one, believe strongly that "&k" is nothing but | | "static_cast<typeof(k)*>(pthread_getspecific(__k_key));" | | It *isn't* a compile-time constant (just like &errno isn't a compile | time constant).
Right now, what you said matches my understanding of the issue. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
