Ken Hagan wrote: [...] > 3a If we allow C<&k> [...] It is then possible to initialise static > variables [...] and the results depend on the thread that ran > first. Again, we have the same "problem" passing a pointer to > a function, so I'm not bothered by this.
3b We allow C<&k> and make all its statics thread-local as well. The "problem" is that, probably, it will result in an equal number of somewhat irritated programmers as the 3a above. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
