Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | I disagree with your conclusion. As I've said elsewhere, &k can be a > | compile-time constant in the same way that &X::k is a compile-time > | constant. > > Certainly, you've said that. But that assertion by itself does not > constitute a proof of the well-foundness of the attempted analogy or > whether the analogy actually constitutes a proof.
It's not intended to be proof in the mathematical sense; I doubt I have the energy for that ;-), though I think MSVC probably constitutes an existence proof. I'm hoping people will "just see" that it's possible based on what I've said. I doubt I can explain it any better than I have at this point. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
