Is shared_count scheduled to come out from the detail namespace and be publically available and maybe a bit documented?
I don't think we should encourage users to use things from detail namespace? /Michel Phil Nash wrote: > Peter suggested I use shared_count when I first started talking about > smart_resource (or shared_resource as I was then calling it) over a > year > ago - so it's not a new thing :-) > > [)o > IhIL.. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
