Agreed. But if smart_resource is intended as a contribution to Boost I don't see a big problem.
At 01:48 PM 2/21/2003, Michel André wrote: >Is shared_count scheduled to come out from the detail namespace and be >publically available and maybe a bit documented? > >I don't think we should encourage users to use things from detail namespace? > >/Michel > >Phil Nash wrote: >> Peter suggested I use shared_count when I first started talking about >> smart_resource (or shared_resource as I was then calling it) over a >> year >> ago - so it's not a new thing :-) >> >> [)o >> IhIL.. > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
