"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hum, it looks like Microsoft took you up on it. See the >> shared_ptr_test warning on the VC++ 7.1 beta regression test. > > No, C4675 is the opposite of what Dave wants. Earlier MSVC didn't support > ADL at all, and MSVC 7.1 is now issuing the warning for every place ADL > kicks in since this may alter the behavior of existing code. Dave wants a > warning when ADL could have kicked in but didn't.
Or rather, where it did kick in but it found nothing, so the fallback was the name in the local namespace. > Sounds like a neat plan to solicit _many_ user complaints. ;-) No kidding! -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost