On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:34:43 +0100, Nicola Musatti wrote:[...]
I don't have a strong opinion in either direction, but I do feel that it is important that this is thought over. Overloading checked_delete() on purpose in a user defined namespace might be considered a way to provide a smart pointer with a custom deleter. Is this really something bad?
It won't work as the call is ambiguous and thus rejected by the compiler. But the user it free to provide his own checked_deleter along with his own checked_delete, so there is no limitation that would result from the above fix AFAICS. If you agree, I will make the change in CVS.
No objections.
Cheers, Nicola Musatti
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
