Dave Gomboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource<>, or just >> > managed<>. >> >> Why not just resource<>? Management is implied anyway; that's the >> reason for the existence of the class. > > *laugh* I was thinking exactly the opposite. To me, the resource itself > is clear from the template parameter -- it's the management that needs to > be indicated. > > +1 for managed<>.
I'm with Dave G. on this one. resource<lock> doesn't tell me anything; I already know that every lock is a resource. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
