Peter Dimov wrote:
> It depends on the choice of template parameters, of course. If you go the PB > way, resource<> is definitely a contender: This is definitely the direction I was thinking. Otherwise, we get shared_resource, scoped_resource, movable_resource, etc and we start wanting an abbreviation like _ptr <g> [or in this case, _rsrc?] I certainly like the policy approach here, as I see a policy-based smart pointer and a policy-based resource-manager sharing ownership policies. I still see them as different but related concepts though. -- AlisdairM Team Thai Kingdom _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
