Robert Klarer wrote: > The syntax for declaring a static_string is unfortunate, but once it has > been declared, a static_string's interface is (almost*) the same as that > of a const std::string. Yes, you right it's unfortunate and IMHO is not appropriate for a wide use.
> typedef boost::static_string<'s', 't', 'a', 't', 'i', 'c', '_'> > StrType1; This syntax may be good for some specific (and not widely used) tasks such as building hashing algorithm at compile-time for a given set of static strings but not for "normal" strings. I beveive it's better to wait for a new compiler which can optimize dynamic memory allocations (a possibly even more) away. -- Alexander Nasonov Remove minus and all between minus and at from my e-mail for timely response _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
