"Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> * [config] BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME >> Status currently unknown. John? Aleksey? >> > >Dave A. introduced the macro I would prefer him to change it as he knows >>what's required - or have I nissed something? > > BTW, I've used BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME in my own code with bcc5.5.1 because > this compiler ICEs sometimes if typename is given inside <>, as in > > typedef foo< typename bar::type > the_foo ; > > but not always, so I'm not sure what to do in general.
I guess that rules out BOOST_MSVC_TYPENAME as a name. Is typename ever required with BCC 5.5.1? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
