"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> * [config] BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME > >> Status currently unknown. John? Aleksey? > >> > > >Dave A. introduced the macro I would prefer him to change it as he knows > >>what's required - or have I nissed something? > > > > BTW, I've used BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME in my own code with bcc5.5.1 because > > this compiler ICEs sometimes if typename is given inside <>, as in > > > > typedef foo< typename bar::type > the_foo ; > > > > but not always, so I'm not sure what to do in general. > > I guess that rules out BOOST_MSVC_TYPENAME as a name. > Is typename ever required with BCC 5.5.1? >
With BCC5.5.1 typename is _never required_ AFAIK, but it is with BCC5.6.0(4) Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
