Larry Evans wrote: [...]
>>> It's pretty good. "ip_assign_op_switch" is faster than >>> "ip_offset_iterator" but must be explicit? >>> > I was afraid of that(as indicated in 6.2.2 of the .html file); > however, ip_offset_iterator > is more "robust" (as indicated in 6.2.3 item 2). Maybe some boost > template guru's > could figure a way to hack a "virtual template member function" as > mentioned in > item 4 of 6.1.2. A "virtual template member function". It looks like another virtual table will have to be gradually constructed at compile time, just like what I did last year with ptr<T, complex_tree>: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/ptr/ptr.hpp.old. The table could return the address of the template member function given some class X and template parameter Y. Philippe _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
