On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:26:04 -0500, David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That sounds right. Would you like to post a proposed replacement (or >patch) for the page as written which addresses your points? You embarrass me. I think the page is ok as long as you don't say "during" stack unwinding; also I would prefer "could exit via an exception" rather than "could throw". More-or-less: "Don't embed a std::string object or any other data member or base class whose copy constructor could exit via an exception. That could lead you straight from the point of throw to std::terminate()" Maybe you can also add an exclamation point as a pinch of sound intimidation :-) Genny. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
