Aleksey, [snip] > So, while here at work we have developed an in-house technology > that achieves that goal for small-to-medium FSMs (the first prototype > of which is outlined in the MPL paper), I am really looking forward to > studying experts' work on the subject.
Thanks, but I'm by no means an expert! All experience I have is some 1.5 years of heavy exposure. I was hoping that an expert would maybe tune into the discussion here at boost. BTW, an adapted version of your double-dispatch implementation made it into my library. > Well, meanwhile, besides the above, my first comment is going to be > really minor - I browsed over the tutorial (which looks great!), and > although I am sure you know it, I thought it would be worth to point > out that the 'public' specifier is redundant when the derived class > is declared as 'struct'; if you omit those, the examples' syntax would > become even more DSL-like (== better :). Good point (I didn't know as I'm not using structs all that often), I will change code and docs accordingly. However, I won't release for about two weeks, as reviewers might get confused if changes happen more often. Thanks, Andreas _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
