Daryle Walker wrote: [snip] > > (I want to finally add an [auto]array-variant to Boost, and I want to make > it close to the latest conventions.) >
I support your proposal. I too feel there's an "assymmetry" in the boost::smart-ptrs. I've been using the auto_array_ptr by Greg Colvin found here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/auto_array_ptr/ and I believe this is almost exactly what you had in mind. If I understand things correctly, the only reason it's not already in boost is hesitation to add more separate smart-pointers before consensus could be reached regarding a possible policy based impl. (and no one pushed it through a review) regards // Fredrik _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
