"Andreas Huber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Beman, > > Thanks for your work on this. Looks good to me. One minor thing: > >> No change from the current status. If your project does not >> redistribute Boost source code, you don't have to redistribute the >> license, regardless of how much non-Boost source code is >> redistributed. >> >> Hope that helps, > > What about html files? Are they considered to be under the "the > Software" umbrella? Html or any other form of electronic > documentation can be seen as software but you could just as well > argue that it's only data (which AFAICT would not fall under the > license then). > > BTW, I (German mother-tongue) agree with Rene that the long > sentences are a bit difficult to grasp. However, I don't care that > much as long as it's legally bullet-proof.
Nothing is legally bullet-proof. People should not have illusions about that. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
