"Maxim Egorushkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Jonathan David Turkanis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > ... > > ... You just call new_source or new_sink > > with whatever object you want to make into a source/sink. This is less > > verbose than using, e.g., streambuf iterators. ... > I agree. This is just a matter of taste. I would prefer to write more > generic adapter classes and a bunch of factories. Are you suggesting factories like new_streambuf_source? This sounds okay. I prefer sticking with new_source and new_sink, because it is less typing :-). At any rate, I realize you were right that my adapters contained unnecessary duplication. I rewrote istream_source et al. to make them derive from the iterator-based adapters. Now they just consist of some typedefs and simple inline constructors. Thanks, Jonathan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
