--- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This saves us from having to find a representational > scheme that will > fit on top of an unknown number of platforms which > might not have > anything in common. >
I think this is where we disagree. I prefer to find a single low-level represntation scheme that could be implemented on top of an unknown number of platforms. The representation could be even expressed in terms of a C API, it doesn't matter. The modern C++ layer will use the single representation, and not worry about a specific platform at all. The C++ layer will reside in .h files completely. If we do something like this, then our library will support Rainer Deyke's requirements (see his post in this thread). Eugene __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
