David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Alisdair Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The fix I am currently using looks like this in shared_ptr [line 284] > > > > void swap(shared_ptr<T> & other) // never throws > > { > > #if BOOST_WORKAROUND( __BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT( 0x0564) ) > > _STL::swap(px, other.px); > > #else > > std::swap(px, other.px); > > #endif > > pn.swap(other.pn); > > } > > > > I am not submitting this as a diff yet as I am not sure this is the > > 'correct' patch yet, but I hope it gives the idea. A similar patch > > needs to be applied everywhere in Boost std::swap is called, which could > > be quite a bit of work. I am happy to go through all the libraries and > > submit appropriate diffs, but first I would like agreement a patch is > > appropriate, and the correct form. > > I'm trying to say that I think it's the wrong patch. The right patch > would put the swap specialization into _STL::. > It actually sufixes to put any 'std' extension in a nested namespace (say, stdx); then injecting the names in 'std'.
Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
