Aleksey Gurtovoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> Matthias Troyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Dear Boosters, >> > >> > Since some of the applications and libraries we plan on releasing soon >> > rely on Boost features and bugfixes that are in the CVS but not in >> > Boost 1.30.[012] I wonder what the plans are for the Boost 1.31.0 >> > release? Since we would prefer to base our released software on a >> > Boost release instead of a CVS snapshot I would be interested in >> > hearing about the plans for a Boost 1.31 release >> >> As far as I know the CVS is in very good health at the moment. > > Uhmm, I really wouldn't say so! If you look at the main trunk report - > http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/resources/cvs_main_trunk/developer_summary_page.html, > there are lots of regressions comparing to 1.30.0, and IMO we ought to fix > all these before we branch for the release or anything.
Regarding http://tinyurl.com/jhtn: does this compiler ever need the typename keyword? If not, perhaps we ought to define BOOST_NO_DEDUCED_TYPENAME for all Borland versions> -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
