Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: > >> In that case, can I release 1.30.2? I don't like having the 1.30.1 >> debacle hanging over my head. > > > There are new regressions on Linux (RC_1_30_0 branch): > http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux-rc-1_30_0/developer_summary_page.html > > > crc has regressions for gcc-3.1 and gcc-3.2.3 > config, format and io have regressions for intel 7.1
According to your chart, the following libraries are all regressing: config crc date_time format function graph io math multi_array numeric/interval numeric/ublas optional random static_assert test type_traits utility Are these real regressions or just newly-tested compilers? Can the library authors/maintainers address these problems? Where is our maintenance wizard? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost