Aleksey Gurtovoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: >> David Abrahams wrote: >> > Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > > For a lightly used toolset like intel-7.1 with STLPort, "looks for all >> > > the world like a config problem" seems like a good enough resolution >> > > to me. >> > >> > In that case, can I release 1.30.2? I don't like having the 1.30.1 >> > debacle hanging over my head. >> >> Can it wait a day or two? As regression maintainers, we are interested in >> fixing this one. > > OK, it looks like simply integrating the main trunk version
Of what? intel-win32-tools.jam? I did ask Misha to try using that with the RC_1_30 branch, but never heard back. > will take care of it - http://tinyurl.com/jtpd. What would be the > right way to do it in the CVS terms at the moment? Should we just > follow the procedure in > http://www.boost.org/more/release_procedures.htm, or there is more > to it? That procedure should work. If the 3rd step doesn't result in a file with the same contents as your current state after "integrating the main trunk version", you should make it so. > (e.g. what's with this mysterious RC_1_30_2 tag?) It's not mysterious but it is misnamed. Shoulda been RC_1_30_2a1. IOW, it's a non-branch tag marking the first release candidate for 1.30.2. You can ignore it. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
