Joe Gottman wrote:
> They are considering a language solution. See this link:
> http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2003/n1483.pdf
Wow, that is good. I like the new syntax...
0,01$: But maybe they could add some template specifier before its
declaration; this could help typename / non-type arguments / template
templates arguments:
template <... typename A>
void foo(A const &)
{
}
template <... long double A>
void foo()
{
}
template <... template <typename> A>
void foo()
{
}
foo<int, long, double>(1, 2, 3);
foo<1, 2, 3, 4, 5>();
foo<map, list, vector>();
0,01$: And they should rename 'the-return-type' to something else...
something like 'nameless' or 'holotype'.
Philippe
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
