Hi Petr, Petr Koèmíd wrote: > Hi, > > There is a problem with variant library simply including boost/variant, for > current anonymous cvs. > > Can be demonstrated by compiling a binary tree example from the doc page. Both > gcc 3.2 and 3.2.2 says: > > * In file included from boost/boost/variant/variant.hpp:25, > * from boost/boost/variant.hpp:22, > * from example.cpp:18: > * boost/boost/variant/detail/forced_return.hpp:57: default argument specified > in explicit specialization > > I think problem is with BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(void) > Simply removing that workaround macro from forced_return works for me as a > dirty workaround. [snip]
I was recently made aware of this problem after BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS was defined under gcc. (See http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg49973.php for the thread that prompted this change.) Anyhow, I've fixed the problem with variant, so if you update from CVS (also make sure you update boost/config/suffix.hpp), everything should work as desired. Thanks, Eric _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
