Hi, There is a problem with variant library simply including boost/variant, for current anonymous cvs.
Can be demonstrated by compiling a binary tree example from the doc page. Both gcc 3.2 and 3.2.2 says: * In file included from boost/boost/variant/variant.hpp:25, * from boost/boost/variant.hpp:22, * from example.cpp:18: * boost/boost/variant/detail/forced_return.hpp:57: default argument specified in explicit specialization I think problem is with BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(void) Simply removing that workaround macro from forced_return works for me as a dirty workaround. The question is, why BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS on gcc 3.2.x? config/compiler/gcc.hpp comments about some unspecified bug, while documentation says only about VC6. The same bug in both compilers? Strange. Diving more in config, little of compiler specific code pollutes config/suffix.hpp, shouldnt it go to compiler specific config instead? Petr Kocmid _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
