David Abrahams wrote: > Douglas Paul Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, David Abrahams wrote: > >> According to your chart, the following libraries are all regressing: > >> function > >> > >> Are these real regressions or just newly-tested compilers? Can the > >> library authors/maintainers address these problems? Where is our > >> maintenance wizard? > > > > All of the failures for function are due to newly-tested compilers. > > Misha and Aleksey -- I think we really need to distinguish those > failures from real regressions in the chart somehow or we'll never be > able to tell where we stand.
Well, it was assumed that when adding a new compiler one should use re-run the regressions against the previous release and report the current status using _those_ expected results. But in any case, you have a point - for one, it's not always practical/possible to do the full re-run. We'll look into it. Aleksey _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
