I consider single storage vital in my intended uses of variant. I would slightly prefer option 1 ( void ) over option 2 ( boost::empty ) but not at the expense of availability of the implementation of Microsoft compilers.
Option 3 would definitely not get my vote. Keith Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Eric Friedman wrote: > [snip] >> ...there are alternative (albeit less elegant) options. [snip] > > I'd like to present what are IMO the most viable options for manually > disabling variant's double storage. [ snip ] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
