Eric Friedman wrote: > If I understand you correctly, earlier versions of variant did precisely > what you describe. Unfortunately, the "assumption" you make is false in > general. See http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1311813. > > Eric
Well, is_polymorphic<T> based on compiler properties beyond the standrad. Why not optimize variant for compilers which safely memcpy forth and back? -- Alexander Nasonov Remove minus and all between minus and at from my e-mail for timely response _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
