On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would you consider widening this out to a "North of 128" PM?
I'd love to see something like this happen *in addition* to the
Boston.pm meetings in town. I see no reason to make a separate PM
group since the Boston one is active and busy. Why not just have
the Burlington auxiliary, and maintain the group as one group with
multiple meetings a month in various locations? Ronald doesn't
*have* to be organizing every meeting.
srl
--
Shane R. Landrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] "In the end,
you write the book that grabs you by the throat and demands to be written."
- Salman Rushdie
- [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Anthony R. J. Ball
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Ted Gilchrist
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... dpuro
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Chris Nandor
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Anthony R. J. Ball
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Anthony R. J. Ball
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Chris Devers
- RE: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... srl
- RE: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Paul Rogers [CE]
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... John Tsangaris
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Chris Nandor
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Uri Guttman
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Matthew Brooks
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Ted Gilchrist
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Anthony R. J. Ball
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Chris Devers
- RE: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Paul Rogers [CE]
- Re: [Boston.pm] Non-boston.pm, maybe... Anthony R. J. Ball
