My analysis did not go that far. But agreed that SCO's strategy is to drag it as much as possible, they are probably looking for a buyout based on the potential, or this might be a good exit strategy for SCO's top execs, that is leave when shares rally.
__________________________________________ Ranga Nathan / CSG Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services; BAX Global Inc. Irvine-California Tel: 714-442-7591 Fax: 714-442-2840 John Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/20/2005 06:04 PM To Federico Lucifredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ranga Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc [email protected], [email protected] Subject Re: [Boston.pm] Computerworld says - SCO wins a legal victory On Thursday 20 January 2005 20:22, Federico Lucifredi wrote: > Ranga Nathan wrote: > > >Anyone seen this? > > > > > >http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/legalissues/story/0,10801,99098,00.html?source=NLT_PM&nid=99098 > > > > > > > They won a "discovery order" of sorts... they can get a look at code IBM > did not show them. > > >Does it have any impact on this case? > > > > > Hmm - they got to look at some IBM code. Lets call it a victory! YAY! > Shares Rally to 4$! > > Computerworld should know better than using expressions like > "programming code" - pih. As always, when you're wondering about what something means in the SCO cases, your best place to look for real information is groklaw: www.groklaw.net covers all of the SCO cases, listing what happens and also explaining what it means. It also covers other legal cases and issues relating to open source - Novell vs. Microsoft, Microsoft monopoly cases, laws and lobbying reagarding the various forms of intellectual property, cases and issues around the GPL and other FOSS licenses, media reports that cover open source with and whatever else takes PJ's fancy. For their general purpose of maximal FUD for the maximal period, yes, this is a victory for SCO. IBM has already provided huge amounts of code in previous discovery, and has explained that the additional code that SCO was asking for would be prohibitably expensive for them to provide. While SCO didn't get everything they asked for, there is a lot there. IBM will either have to oppose this order, or provide it. Either approach could mean lots of additional delay to the case. In the long run, IBM's case is solid while SCO's case is more like wishful thinking or worse; but I don't think anyone has any illusions left about actually winning the case (if anyone there ever did), they are simply trying to delay as long as possible the time until the bubble bursts. John Macdonald _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
