>> I looked at Bazaar...the startup hurdles were steep. > What specifically did you run into as a stumbling block?
i forget, it may have been effort to tie it to Ubuntu's LaunchPad with secure identity. > Bazaar ... > just doesn't obscure the system by imposing a particular > workflow that requires a conceptual staging area (index). Git doesn't REQUIRE it, you can commit -a direct from working. 'Obscure' is pejorative. I will agree that 'index' is a poor word choice in my American English. The workflow with add/index may seem unnatural until you try it for a while, and realize how & when the staging interaction of add, status, diff is actually useful while setting up a batch commit. > The bigger question is whether one of the newer "porcelian" front-ends to > git will address the UI issues, What UI issues? You've asserted that and mentionaed a feature you'd rather not use but didn't know you cold avoid. (UI? what ui? we don't need no stinkin ui, Source control should either be hooked in the IDE or in my shell command line.) There's a 'problem' that it's different and if you don't accept it's different you never accept how it *does* work. If what you do is so different from what Linus and the kernel krew do, maybe you need something else. eh. -- Bill n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list Boston-pm@mail.pm.org http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
