Hi, Terry. I think that is true even if you store braille files on your
computer, but I remember doing this with my braille lite. The braille files
were always smaller than the text files.
At 3/16/2004, you wrote:
Dear Paul,
I could be wrong, but braille files, whether they are KeyWord braille or
.brf, will take up less space than text files, whether they are KeyWord,
ASCII, WP, RTF, etc.
Terri Pannett, Amateur Radio call sign KF^CA. Army MARS call sign AAT9PX,
California
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Henrichsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:28 PM
Subject: [Braillenote] keyword or another file type to store
: Hi, Everyone.
: someone once told me that keyword files were much larger than their doc or
: rtf counterparts. As far as I can tell, the only reason for storing as a
: keyword file is so you can set bookmarks or place markers.
: With small files, book marks or place markers might be an idea, but with
: something large like the bible, it isn't feasible until we can do
bookmarks
: by number rather than letter. So, What do you all think?
: Is it better to store as docs, rtf's txt, etc instead of just converting
: everything to keyword files? Would it be a better use of disk space to do
: so? Do keyword files load any faster than other types?
: Thanks.
: Paul Henrichsen
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: <home.pacbell.net/paulh52>
:
:
:
: ___
: To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
: http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote
:
___
To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote
Paul Henrichsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<home.pacbell.net/paulh52>
