On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 03:52:17AM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> @@ -1095,23 +1095,25 @@ static void br_ip6_multicast_update_active(struct 
> net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
>  {
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>       if (force_inactive)
> -             brmctx->ip6_active = false;
> +             WRITE_ONCE(brmctx->ip6_active, false);
>       else
> -             brmctx->ip6_active = br_ip6_multicast_querier_exists(brmctx);
> +             WRITE_ONCE(brmctx->ip6_active, 
> br_ip6_multicast_querier_exists(brmctx));
>  #endif
>  }
>  
>  static void br_multicast_notify_active(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
>                                      bool ip4_active_old, bool ip6_active_old)
>  {
> -     if (brmctx->ip4_active == ip4_active_old &&
> -         brmctx->ip6_active == ip6_active_old)
> +     int ip4_active = READ_ONCE(brmctx->ip4_active);
> +     int ip6_active = READ_ONCE(brmctx->ip6_active);

I believe that this is unnecessary since we are holding the lock and it
will confuse people reading the code. We only need the READ_ONCE() later
on in the data path

> +
> +     if (ip4_active == ip4_active_old &&
> +         ip6_active == ip6_active_old)
>               return;
>  
>       br_info(brmctx->br, "mc_active changed, vid: %i: v4: %i->%i, v6: 
> %i->%i\n",
>               brmctx->vlan ? brmctx->vlan->vid : -1,
> -             ip4_active_old, brmctx->ip4_active,
> -             ip6_active_old, brmctx->ip6_active);
> +             ip4_active_old, ip4_active, ip6_active_old, ip6_active);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -1136,7 +1138,8 @@ static void br_multicast_notify_active(struct 
> net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
>   */
>  static void br_multicast_update_active(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx)
>  {
> -     bool ip4_active_old = brmctx->ip4_active, ip6_active_old = 
> brmctx->ip6_active;
> +     bool ip4_active_old = READ_ONCE(brmctx->ip4_active);
> +     bool ip6_active_old = READ_ONCE(brmctx->ip6_active);

Same

>       bool force_inactive = false;
>  
>       lockdep_assert_held_once(&brmctx->br->multicast_lock);
> @@ -4266,13 +4269,13 @@ void br_multicast_ctx_init(struct net_bridge *br,
>       brmctx->multicast_membership_interval = 260 * HZ;
>  
>       brmctx->ip4_querier.port_ifidx = 0;
> -     brmctx->ip4_active = 0;
> +     WRITE_ONCE(brmctx->ip4_active, 0);
>       seqcount_spinlock_init(&brmctx->ip4_querier.seq, &br->multicast_lock);
>       brmctx->multicast_igmp_version = 2;
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>       brmctx->multicast_mld_version = 1;
>       brmctx->ip6_querier.port_ifidx = 0;
> -     brmctx->ip6_active = 0;
> +     WRITE_ONCE(brmctx->ip6_active, 0);
>       seqcount_spinlock_init(&brmctx->ip6_querier.seq, &br->multicast_lock);
>  #endif
>  
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 

Reply via email to