On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 06:00:46PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
[...]
> > +test_inactive_other_querier_norespdelay()
> > +{
> > + RET=0
> > +
> > + test_active_setup_bridge "1" "2" "3" "4" "5" "6"
> > + test_active_setup_config "1" "2" "3" ""
> > + #test_active_setup_wait
>
> Why the comment? There are more instances below
The intention was just to highlight what was skipped in comparison
to the according test_{vlan,}_active_*_querier() variants.
Do you think I should remove these lines? Or add a brief
clarification, something like "# skipped: test_active_setup_wait"?
