[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > This still sounds like packet-socket territory to me. Wouldn't it be > better to clarify/extend the packet-socket interface to cover bridged > ports?
I think you can just use a packet socket with BPF; that's what dhcpd does and it doesn't seem to incur noticable overhead on non-dhcp traffic. Jason _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
