On Tuesday 13 January 2004 12:41:55 -0800, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
> Reading the man page is indeed confusing for a user, w.r.t. bridge ports.
> I think it would be more logical if all PF_PACKET
> sockets see the frames before the bridge code.
I agree. I just ran into this problem trying to read bridge PDUs from a
daemon listening on a packet socket. I'm glad I found this thread; it saved
me a lot of debugging time.
> How about placing the call to __handle_bridge() right after the second
> list_for_each? If I'm not mistaken the relevant pt_pre->func that would
deal
> with the packet will not have been executed yet, while those PF_PACKET
> functions will already have been called...
Has anyone tested this in the two weeks since it was suggested?
--
Dan Eble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _____ .
| _ |/|
Applied Innovation Inc. | |_| | | "All Protocols MUST be odd"
http://www.aiinet.com/ |__/|_|_| -- RFC 1661 (PPP)
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
