David Hobby wrote: 
> 
>>> This is an action that I take only with GREAT 
>>> reluctance.  However, neither Julia nor I is 
>>> willing to endure harassment of this kind. 
> .... 
>> I imagine that you have collect a lot of interesting 
>> material for your study of internet communities and 
>> how they deal with a crisis. 
>>  
>> Or maybe not - probably the listmembers that would 
>> support Jeroen are silent, because this is not a 
>> conflict between common listmembers, 
>> but between a listmember and the list Overlord. 
>  
>       Hey, you forgot the emoticons!  : ( 
> 
No, I didn't. 
  
>       I guess that I support Nick's action, anyway I 
> gave up and killfiled Jeroen for keeps weeks ago. 
> We keep kicking around ideas on easy ways to 
> collectively deal with individuals who don't  
> respect etiquette.  But until we do come up with one 
> that works, the listowner and overlord has to step in. 
> 
I begin to understand why Jeroen was singled-out to 
be the victim-of-the-day. Some reasons are obvious: 
he *was* a listowner, so our meme of challenge 
authority took control. Others are subtle. 
 
And his behaviour in the past days, with mailbombing, 
lawsuits, and forged headers, make him a very 
tasty target! Who's better to be harassed as someone 
who screams and shouts? 
 
I guess by now everybody will be very pleased, 
seeing how he is reacting. "I was right! He's not 
a member of a civilization! Let's ban him forever!" 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
PS: I am _also_ a meme-stereotype. If everybody is 
against Jeroen, then I must stand to be the Defender 
of the Lost Cause :-) 
 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Reply via email to