On 26 Mar 2003 at 19:05, Reggie Bautista wrote: > Damon wrote: > > > I think what would be even more illuminating about this > attack > > > is the nature of the gas. Its quite possible that it may have been > > > a *new* non-lethal suppressive gas that had unforseen serious > > > side-effects. Has this gas been used since? Has any report been > > > done on the use of this gas? What kind of gas was it, exactly? > > John Horn replied: > >Kind of like the gas used in Russia against the Chechyen rebels in > >the theater, I guess. > > I'm *still* not sure how they got away with that one...
The conduct of the Chechyen war by Russia in general has been frankly disgusting, has cost many Russian lives and has managed by it's incomplete effectiveness to become a continuing problem. Andy Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
