Dan Minette wrote: >What I find troublesome with your position is that you seem to suggest >that there is an easy answer to the drug problem.
Don't worry, Doug, Dan insulting you in this way puts you in good company. He has told me and several others that our ideas were simplistic compared to his. That must mean that you are doing well! >As I stated before, drawing the line after instead of before grass >seems very reasonable. But, I do think that the position that >legalizing the sale of all addictive drugs would result in a far worse >state of the nation than what we have now. I agree completely. And we certainly shouldn't stop there. We all know that religion has many effects on the brain that are equal to or worse than drugs like cocaine or heroin. Religion certainly causes many people to lose their rational thinking, religion is highly addictive, and over the years, many many evil acts have been committed in the name of religion. Now, drawing the line after Buddhism and Quakerism is reasonable, I agree, but we definitely need to criminalize Christianity and Islamism due to all the evil acts that have been committed over the years in the names of those religions. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
