http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A56429-2003Aug27.html

"Halliburton, the company formerly headed by Vice
President Cheney, has won contracts worth more than
$1.7 billion under Operation Iraqi Freedom and stands
to make hundreds of millions more dollars under a
no-bid contract awarded by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, according to newly available documents...

"...Waxman's interest in Halliburton was ignited by a
routine Corps of Engineers announcement in March
reporting that the company had been awarded a no-bid
contract, with a $7 billion limit, for putting out
fires at Iraqi oil wells. Corps spokesmen justified
the lack of competition on the grounds that the
operation was part of a classified war plan and the
Army did not have time to secure competitive bids for
the work...

"...The practice of delegating a vast array of
logistics operations to a single contractor dates to
the aftermath of the 1991 Persian Gulf War and a study
commissioned by Cheney, then defense secretary, on
military outsourcing. The Pentagon chose Brown and
Root to carry out the study and subsequently selected
the company to implement its own plan. Cheney served
as chief executive of Brown and Root's parent company,
Halliburton, from 1995 to 2000, when he resigned to
run for the vice presidency...

"...A major problem in Iraq, Singer said, has been the
phenomenon of "no-shows" caused by the inhospitable
security environment, including the killing of
contract workers, including a Halliburton mail
delivery employee earlier this month. 

" "At the end of the day, neither these companies nor
their employees are bound by military justice, and it
is up to them whether to show up or not," Singer said.
"The result is that there have been delays in setting
up showers for soldiers, getting them cooked meals and
so on." 

"A related concern is the rising cost of hiring
contract workers because of skyrocketing insurance
premiums. Singer estimates that premiums have
increased by 300 percent to 400 percent this year,
costs that are passed on to the taxpayer under the
cost-plus-award fee system that is the basis for most
contracts..."

Now I have no idea how correct this blogger is, or
indeed if "she" lives in Iraq, but she'd have to be
off by a factor of ~50 to invalidate the cost
conclusion:

http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_riverbendblog_archive.html#106208201838841818
(from 8/28/03)
"Listen to this little anecdote. One of my cousins
works in a prominent engineering company in Baghdad-
we’ll call the company H. This company is well-known
for designing and building bridges all over Iraq. My
cousin, a structural engineer, is a bridge freak. He
spends hours talking about pillars and trusses and
steel structures to anyone who’ll listen. 

"As May was drawing to a close, his manager told him
that someone from the CPA wanted the company to
estimate the building costs of replacing the New
Diyala Bridge on the South East end of Baghdad. He got
his team together, they went out and assessed the
damage, decided it wasn’t too extensive, but it would
be costly. They did the necessary tests and analyses
(mumblings about soil composition and water depth,
expansion joints and girders) and came up with a
number they tentatively put forward- $300,000. This
included new plans and designs, raw materials (quite
cheap in Iraq), labor, contractors, travel expenses,
etc.

"Let’s pretend my cousin is a dolt. Let’s pretend he
hasn’t been working with bridges for over 17 years.
Let’s pretend he didn’t work on replacing at least 20
of the 133 bridges damaged during the first Gulf War.
Let’s pretend he’s wrong and the cost of rebuilding
this bridge is four times the number they estimated-
let’s pretend it will actually cost $1,200,000. Let’s
just use our imagination.

"A week later, the New Diyala Bridge contract was
given to an American company. This particular company
estimated the cost of rebuilding the bridge would be
around- brace yourselves- $50,000,000 !!..." 

[The description of the 9 rotating presidents of the
council is scathing (8/26/03, under "Let's Play
Musical Chairs"); here is one:
"The Puppet: Mohammed Bahr Ul Iloom
Otherwise known as ‘Mohammed Bahr Ul- who???’ Very few
people seem to have heard of him. He is a Shi’a Muslim
cleric who fled Iraq in 1991. He was in exile in
London. He is also in his 80s and his only political
qualification seems to be the fact that he fled and
considered himself in exile. He promptly squelched any
chance he had at gaining popularity by being the one
selected to declare April 9 the Iraqi National Day."]

So, not only does a company with ties to the current
vice-president get no-bid contracts worth millions
(after they'd done a favorable study on outsourcing -
themselves!), but local talent goes to waste; American
taxpayers get to pay more, and Iraqis have less work
and less of a hand in self-governance.

We need the backing of the UN, and the
financial/personnel support of the international
community (and yes, they will have to have a voice
also) to rebuild Iraq; we cannot leave until the
country is functioning again.

Debbi
Rock And A Hard Bend In The River Maru


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to