On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 03:15:34PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 2:57 PM > Subject: Re: Which beliefs are labled real; which are labled figments > > > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 02:48:46PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: > > > > > >And your neat little insistence that no data is necessary or possible > > > >about the existence of this figment. > > > > > > Uh-huh, just like no data is necessary or possible concerning your > > > self-awareness. But, talking about that is diverting, because you > > > believe in it. :-) > > > > You appear to have me confused with someone else. > > > > > No. I'll freely admit there is no emperical proof that God exists, > > > > Then why pretend that it exists? > > OK, lets walk through this slowly. Is your position that it is irrational > to believe in anything that is not subjected to empirical verification?
No. And you are avoiding the question. Brainwashing strikes again. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
