http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/24/politics/campaign/24bible.html?ex=1253764800&en=e610b7f6cc429a67&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland


The Republican Party acknowledged yesterday sending mass mailings to
residents of two states warning that "liberals" seek to ban the Bible.
It said the mailings were part of its effort to mobilize religious
voters for President Bush.

The mailings include images of the Bible labeled "banned" and of a gay
marriage proposal labeled "allowed." A mailing to Arkansas residents
warns: "This will be Arkansas if you don't vote." A similar mailing
was sent to West Virginians.

A liberal religious group, the Interfaith Alliance, circulated a copy
of the Arkansas mailing to reporters yesterday to publicize it. "What
they are doing is despicable,'' said Don Parker, a spokesman for the
alliance. "They are playing on people's fears and emotions."

In an e-mail message, Christine Iverson, a spokeswoman for the
Republican National Committee, confirmed that the party had sent the
mailings.

"When the Massachusetts Supreme Court sanctioned same-sex marriage and
people in other states realized they could be compelled to recognize
those laws, same-sex marriage became an issue,'' Ms. Iverson said.
"These same activist judges also want to remove the words 'under God'
from the Pledge of Allegiance."

The mailing is the latest evidence of the emphasis Republicans are
putting on motivating conservative Christian voters to vote this fall.
But as the appeals become public, they also risk alienating moderate
and swing voters.

An editorial on Sept. 22 in The Charleston Gazette in West Virginia,
for example, asked, "Holy Moley! Who concocts this gibberish?"

"Most Americans see morality more complexly," the editorial said.
"Many think a higher morality is found in Christ's command to help the
needy, prevent war and pursue other humanitarian goals. Churchgoers of
this sort aren't likely to believe childish allegations that Democrats
want to ban the Bible."

In statement, Senator John Edwards, the Democratic vice-presidential
nominee, said President Bush "should condemn the practice immediately
and tell everyone associated with the campaign to never use tactics
like this again."

Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task
Force, called the mailings an ugly contrast to Mr. Bush's public
statements. Although the president has called for a constitutional
amendment banning same-sex marriage, he often emphasizes the need for
tolerance as well.

"The president takes more or less the high road and his henchman and
allies on the right have been let loose to conduct these ugly,
divisive smear campaigns," Mr. Foreman said. "It is wedge politics at
its worst."

In any event, the Bush campaign appears confident about its religious
appeal.

The mailing seeks to appeal to conservative evangelical Protestant
pastors and political leaders who say they worry that legal rights for
same-sex couples could lead to hate-crimes laws that could be applied
against sermons of Bible passages criticizing homosexuality.

Conservative Christian political commentators often cite the case of
Ake Green, a minister in Sweden who was jailed in June for a month for
a sermon denouncing gays as sinful.

Mr. Parker, of the Interfaith Alliance, said, "I think it is laughable
to think that someone could be arrested for reading out loud from the
Bible.''

But Richard Land, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty
Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, argued, "We have the
First Amendment in this country which should protect churches, but
there is no question that this is where some people want to go, that
reading from the Bible could be hate speech."

Still, Mr. Land questioned the assertion that Democrats might ban the
whole Bible. "I wouldn't say it," he said. "I would think that is
probably stretching it a bit far."



xponent

Yeah Right Maru

rob


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to