--- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldn't disagree with a word you've written. The > idea behind the test, > however, was not to determine how you would solve > the problem but to > determine from which angle you would approach it. > As with any truncated > set of answers, some are not compatible with the > angle of those taking the > quiz. > > Doug
You wouldn't? You're awfully certain about which policies are right and wrong on a lot of different issues to agree with what I've written. The two stances conflict. If you want my particular problem with the tests approach to those issues, for example, it kept asking - wouldn't it be best to approach these issues with our allies? Yes, it would be. The problem is the assumption implicit in that question - that our "allies" actually are our allies on these issues. That they can't be bought off (France) or be actively hostile to American interests (China, and maybe also France) or just completely screwed up (Germany under Schroeder). In which case that approach is approximately equivalent to saying "Wouldn't it be nice if I could date Jennifer Garner." Well, it would, but so what? ===== Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Freedom is not free" http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
