On Aug 19, 2005, at 1:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's entirely possible, but I don't think I'd describe what's been
spewing forth recently as "argument". It's a lot more like "Oy vey
schmeer, poor me, poor us, no one has any clue whatsoever and because
of my minority status I am free to both be as overbearing as I want
to *and* accuse anyone who doesn't agree with me totally of ignorance
or worse."
Now you insult me.
Well, it's probably no worse an insult than accusing others of
ignorance and anti-semitism, now is it?
I never claimed minority status.
By pointing out your alignment with Judaism, you did precisely that. Or
are you going to say that you're not Jewish now?
There is no way to win in this discussion. Even a slight questioning
of such a perspective is being insensitive; nothing short of total
disavowal of massive swaths of Western culture is acceptable; nothing
short of repudiation of a person's entire weltanschauung is to be
tolerated if there's even the merest hint of -- totally
unsubstantiated -- anti-semitism.
Again - do some reading before you talk about unsubstantiated claims.
Actually you're the one putting forth the assertions of anti-semitism;
it us up to you to provide documentary evidence to support the claims
you've made. It's not sufficient for you to simply assert that
something is true and expect it to be accepted, particularly since
there *now* seems to be evidence that the neo-con movement is *not*, as
you have claimed, a Jewish organization, either originally or now.
--
Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books
http://books.nightwares.com/
Current work in progress "The Seven-Year Mirror"
http://www.nightwares.com/books/ockrassa/Flat_Out.pdf
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
