On Sep 15, 2006, at 11:15 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/15/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that it would be good for the TV networks
to take on controversial atttudes.
Airing a factually inaccurate historical docu-drama? That is as much
like taking on controversial issues as going on a holiday cruise is
like walking on water.
Rather than continuing to trade rhetorical points, perhaps you could
start by specifying those things that are broadly-accepted factual
inaccuracies - and not just partisan factual inaccuracies....
... So that you can just dismiss them as partisan factual inaccuracies?
Why would anyone waste their time with that pointless game?
Just because it varies from the BushCo agenda does not make it
partisan.
Here's one, though: NOBODY in the Clinton admin was called by
ANYBODY in Afghanistan who was ready to "pick up the package"
or whatever was their code for capturing Bin Laden and refused
to give the authorization. The film included such a scene,
clearly intended only to make Clinton look bad.
What kind of Kool-Aid they serving where you are?
Dave
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
